Conversion Van Dvd Player

"why not visit the company's Consortium Sear Atella"

The February 4, 2010, the Organization Lucana environmentalists had expressed his criticism Sear the consortium of Atella , and at its request, to the offices of the Department of Environment in the Basilicata region, the purpose of issuing the opinion EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) for the 'expansion of the waste stemming from the multi-material recycling and industrial waste Solid fuel for the production of secondary (CSS). Sear the consortium, for its part, he answered with a long note on Basilicata newspaper, ending his article with the environmental organization's invitation to visit its facilities on site to see their modus operandi. The OLA decline the invitation replying:

We are not interested to visit a center for the production of CSS, the secondary solid fuel, because it is a policy contrary to the interests of the territory and for its side effects downstream of the incineration process, also contrary to those of the environment and even to those of proper health policy the territory. La Ola, while appreciating the gentle tone with which those responsible for responding to criticism of the company, declined the invitation to visit the company in the industrial Atella, by attaching itself to a series of responses, which unfortunately does not can be supplied by the company. Very different would be our attitude if the company Atella, instead of bringing the regional EIA for the manufacture of CSS destined to incinerators and cement, had instead presented a project for the region to establish a center of quality composting (compost green) to support true recycling in municipalities Lucan, especially those of the Vulture-Alto- Bradano. Plant still missing that this is likely to derail the virtuous projects of municipalities.


We refer to a collection drive, door to door, already practiced with gratifying results in some municipalities of the Province of Matera implemented some years ago by families including the staff that continue to be ignored in the management waste by many municipalities of the province of Potenza who have opted for "multi-material recycling" (it is a term coined by Ola, but from the same region and the Province of Potenza).

We wonder, for the practical model of recycling in the province of Potenza and Matera Upper Bradano not possible?

Criticism of Ola are therefore primarily addressed to the Region of Basilicata and the Province of Potenza, despite having entered the composting plant in its programs (it is still unclear whether the production of green compost, manure, or that for compost gray material for incineration and landfill cover) prefers to adopt a priority for the production of refuse derived fuel (RDF) in the CSS is the current and last variant. In fact, the Basilicata Region has commissioned the company SpA SOGESID the preparation of calls for expressions of interest aimed at companies private per la realizzazione di inceneritori e impianti di produzione del CDR invece che partire con i centri di compostaggio e di recupero a freddo dei materiali raccolti con la differenziata (vetro, plastica, carta, alluminio, etc). Il Combustibile Derivato dai Rifiuti o CSS è quello destinato al cosiddetto “recupero a caldo”, o meglio alla termovalorizzazione dei rifiuti. Ipotizziamo in proposito che il Consorzio Seari sia intenzionato quindi a partecipare al bando regionale proprio per questo tipo di impiantistica.
La Ola contesta queste soluzioni in un certo senso imposte dalla programmazione regionale per la gestione dei rifiuti ritenendole non solo impattanti per l’ambiente e dannose per la salute umana a causa dei rischi che produce sulle matrici acqua, suolo, aria ed acqua, così come l’inceneritore EDF-Fenice testimonia, ma provoca anche un aumento dei costi di gestione dei rifiuti a carico della collettività a vantaggio esclusivo dei gestori privati, di quelli cioè legati alla progettazione e realizzazione dell’impiantistica degli inceneritori e delle discariche. Queste ultime invece di essere chiuse vengono ampliate o addirittura se ne costruiscono di nuove in base ad ordinanze emergenziali del Presidente della giunta regionale.
Hanno ragione i responsabili del Consorzio Seari quando affermano che é la legge che consente l’utilizzo del combustibile derivato dei rifiuti negli inceneritori, nei cementifici e persino nelle centrali a biomassa, materiale quest’ultimo assimilato al CDR in base ad una Deliberazione della Regione del 2005, ma è altrettanto vero che questa politica di gestione azzera le pratiche virtuose dei Comuni e dei cittadini basate sulla responsabilizzazione dei comportamenti e finalizzati al recupero, riciclo e recupero a freddo dei materiali (dalla carta altra carta, dalla plastica, la plastica e così via).

L’incenerimento dovrebbe rappresentare in base alla normativa vigente una quota molto bassa e comunque residuale della destinazione finale dei rifiuti. Invece proprio attraverso l’espediente della raccolta differenziata multi-materiale si trova il modo, una sorta di stratagemma terminologico e la scorciatoia per incenerire i rifiuti che potrebbero essere recycled and recovered rather cold, such as paper, cardboard, plastics and wood, or the excellent staff that could become usable compost, according to the degree of purity can be obtained with a careful differentiation of domestic waste, agriculture or for the recovery of degraded areas. Therefore not enough to refer to percentage increases in recycling, as well as Sear said, but it is necessary to outline the fees related to the different categories of waste, outlining the precise final location and the savings which the public could get if they were instead recovered in cold incinerated or heat-enhanced waste (CDR). This operation - it should be noted – resa oggi possibile solo grazie agli incentivi pubblici destinati alle imprese private. Non pensiamo quindi di aver effettuato valutazioni incaute, così come la Seari invece ci accusa, allorquando evidenziamo che tra i costi per la collettività vanno ascritti quelli derivanti dagli impatti negativi della cosiddetta termovalorizzazione sull’ambiente, la salute e lo smaltimento delle ceneri prodotte che sono pur sempre rifiuti dipendenti dal loro grado di contaminazione da sostanze inquinanti, quindi alquanto variabili nel costo per operazioni di inertizzazione al punto che spesso finiscono nelle discariche, inquinandole. Se poi si considerano i costi competitivi del CSS – così come afferma Seari – solo in relazione al conferimento in landfill, the statement is contradictory result is that the same company as to how management can trigger a virtuous cycle of collection in the municipalities of the Vulture - Alto Bradano, indeed, even "considerably increase the percentage amount."

We can not finally accept the "warning" at the end of the sear when said "environmental groups = lack of knowledge." We reject the sender then this type of argument typical of certain companies, always ready to proclaim the primacy of words in science and better technology (best practive) at the planning stage that then you notice, during operation, a "bluff" when are unable to admit that they have caused severe environmental damage and pollution, as is the case EDF Phoenix shows. We would like

administrators and citizens of Basilicata are wondering what are the appropriate choices for communities, especially when the responsibility of the companies that pollute (in this case we are not referring to Sear) do not want to pay for damage caused to ' environment. Even before he set himself up as champions of community we will be satisfied that the private companies, especially those with limited liability (other issues to be addressed, given the risks to the environment and human health, as the chronicle tells us, many Ltd are active in the energy field), assuming a rule of conduct code of business, too often only stated in its constituent documents, without confusing the responsibilities between different economic and institutional environment that each person is called to assume. La Ola is always based on official data and national and regional never expresses itself on figures, partial or ambiguous that may be provided by stakeholders and not standardized.

Adapted from Olambientalista